This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> wrote: > Yes, that would work too. I didn't know some targets actually require > MEM exrepssion here. > Could you test if it solves PPC problem? And it does. Here is the patch which I bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64-linux-gnu with no regressions and all the nonlocal label tests now pass. OK? Thanks, Andrew Pinski ChangeLog: PR middle-end/36594 * builtins.c (expand_builtin_nonlocal_goto): Stabilize the address of the memory instead of the memory itself for the save area.
Attachment:
fixnonlocal.diff.txt
Description: Text document
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |