This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [lto][patch] add -flto-single option

From: "Bill Maddox" <maddox at google dot com>
To: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo at google dot com>
Cc: "Rafael Espindola" <espindola at google dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:35:38 -0700
Subject: Re: [lto][patch] add -flto-single option
References: <38a0d8450806230947u22061802p5f70cfb3c9b45cee@mail.gmail.com> <b798aad50806231010s3c65db9bhe935776465799d83@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:47, Rafael Espindola <espindola@google.com> wrote:

> You forgot the patch.  If it's the same as the one Bill posted last
> year, I think I had already approved it, but I don't recall.  The next
> thing would be checking out why g++ -flto is not behaving the same as
> gcc -flto (doesn't seem to be calling lto1).

I think the problem is that the changes to the specs
strings were done in gcc.c, but not in cp/lang-specs.h.

--Bill

References:
- [lto][patch] add -flto-single option
  - From: Rafael Espindola
- Re: [lto][patch] add -flto-single option
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]