This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, AVR, Committed] Add support for new AVR device ATtiny13A

From: "Anatoly Sokolov" <aesok at post dot ru>
To: "Weddington, Eric" <eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:49:00 +0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH, AVR, Committed] Add support for new AVR device ATtiny13A
References: <5810188760.20080619203838@post.ru> <258DDD1F44B6ED4AAFD4370847CF58D501B73946@csomb01.corp.atmel.com>

Hello Eric.

> I respectively disagree. According to my knowledge the ATtiny13A is a
> fit and function equivalent of the ATtiny13, and it is basically a
> process change. IMO, this does not really warrant a new device name as
> there is no code generation difference and no I/O header file difference
> (register, bit names) between these two devices.

In according the "AVR520: Migrating from ATtiny13 to ATtiny13A"* Application 
Note the ATtiny13A have two new SFR - PPR and BODRC, and therefore  
need separate I/O header file fot ATtiny13A device.

* http://www.atmel.com/dyn/products/product_card.asp?part_id=4347

Anatoly.

References:
- [PATCH, AVR, Committed] Add support for new AVR device ATtiny13A
  - From: Anatoly Sokolov
- RE: [PATCH, AVR, Committed] Add support for new AVR device ATtiny13A
  - From: Weddington, Eric

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]