This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] New early loop unrolling pass

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
Cc: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at kam dot mff dot cuni dot cz>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:24:00 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New early loop unrolling pass
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804261923540.4130@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <20080426180241.GA14791@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804262006560.4130@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804262244190.4130@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <4814AE72.4050609@gnu.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804271908510.4130@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>

Richard Guenther wrote:

On Sun, 27 Apr 2008, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
I re-bootstrapped and tested the following which I'll apply tomorrow
if there are no objections.
I think it's better to apply (and post as well) the two patches in isolation.
Two patches? Btw, I just committed the patch.

Whatever Zdenek suggested is the second patch. If I had seen a separate patch I might have understood what he suggested. :-)

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] New early loop unrolling pass
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak

References:
- [PATCH] New early loop unrolling pass
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] New early loop unrolling pass
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak
- Re: [PATCH] New early loop unrolling pass
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] New early loop unrolling pass
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] New early loop unrolling pass
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [PATCH] New early loop unrolling pass
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]