This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [trunk] patch to remove REG_NO_CONFLICT_BLOCKS
- From: "Steven Bosscher" <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: "Vladimir Makarov" <vmakarov at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "Kenneth Zadeck" <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Richard Sandiford" <rsandifo at nildram dot co dot uk>, "Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>, "Bergner, Peter" <bergner at vnet dot ibm dot com>, "Bonzini, Paolo" <bonzini at gnu dot org>, "Park, Seongbae" <seongbae dot park at gmail dot com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:08:49 +0200
- Subject: Re: [trunk] patch to remove REG_NO_CONFLICT_BLOCKS
- References: <480CAD35.8040709@naturalbridge.com> <480D023A.3030609@redhat.com> <571f6b510804211438u5427381x4755477d221b3ec@mail.gmail.com> <480E6BBC.6030000@redhat.com> <480E8BAB.4050200@naturalbridge.com> <480F56EC.6050206@redhat.com>
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com> wrote:
> It would be nice to know you current position what are you going to do with
> the local allocator. As I wrote personally I don't care about the old RA
> anymore but I see other people do really care about local-alloc.
Does that mean you will also try to make IRA work at -O0? Otherwise
we will still end up with (at least remnants of) the old allocator and
IRA side-by-side...
Gr.
Steven