This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch] Warning during GCC bootstrap on i686-pc-mingw32

From: "Danny Smith" <dansmister at gmail dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: "GCC Patches" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Kai Tietz" <Kai dot Tietz at onevision dot com>, "FX Coudert" <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:48:22 +1200
Subject: Re: [Patch] Warning during GCC bootstrap on i686-pc-mingw32
References: <9c03c2dd0804151852m6c2e010bm222590f8a3ff09ee@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804161158080.6459@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:03 AM, Joseph S. Myers
<joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Danny Smith wrote:
>
>  > 2008-04-16  Danny Smith  <dannysmith@users.net>
>  >
>  >       * c-format.c (check_format_info_main): Use strncmp rather than a magic prefix
>  >       to handle multichar length specs.
>
>  This C front-end change is OK, but you need to add a testcase that
>  verifies the correct diagnostic in this case (passes with and fails
>  without the patch).
>
Is attached  testcase suitable?

testsuite/ChangeLog

2008-04-16  Danny Smith  <dannysmith@users.net>

       * gcc.dg/format/ms-warnI64-1.c: New file.

Attachment: ms-warnI64-1.c
Description: Binary data

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch] Warning during GCC bootstrap on i686-pc-mingw32
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

References:
- [Patch] Warning during GCC bootstrap on i686-pc-mingw32
  - From: Danny Smith
- Re: [Patch] Warning during GCC bootstrap on i686-pc-mingw32
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]