This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tuples] Fix miscompilation of gimple.c

From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo at google dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, "Bill Maddox" <maddox at google dot com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 18:42:36 -0800
Subject: Re: [tuples] Fix miscompilation of gimple.c
References: <b798aad50803051832x3bea2300vc199639ca009b086@mail.gmail.com> <de8d50360803051838j30e9ba50w4c4eb0d1408e81b7@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com> wrote:
>  > A void function should not return a value.
>
>  In C90/C99, it is valid to do return a(); if the return type is void
>  for both functions.  This is not valid C++ though.

I have it backwards, oops.  Anyways this is caused by the fact normal
bootstrap is broken for the tuples branch.

-- Pinski

References:
- [tuples] Fix miscompilation of gimple.c
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tuples] Fix miscompilation of gimple.c
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]