This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] [tuples] some aux functions
- From: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at kam dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
- To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
- Cc: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Bill Maddox <maddox at google dot com>, Rafael Espindola <espindola at google dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:45:55 +0100
- Subject: Re: [patch] [tuples] some aux functions
- References: <47BEE2D6.4020402@google.com>
Hi,
> On 2/22/08 7:35 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> >I see. So in theory we could just add two new predicate codes
> >'TRUE' and 'FALSE', which regardless of LHS or RHS evaluate
> >to true or false.
>
> We could, but I don't know if this is common enough to justify yet
> another tree code.
given that all such conditions will be removed in the next cfg cleanup,
I think introducing such codes would just complicate things
unnecessarily,
Zdenek