This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR32315 - DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing [regression vs. g77]

From: "Paul Richard Thomas" <paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com>
To: FX <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
Cc: "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:26:37 +0100
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR32315 - DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing [regression vs. g77]
References: <339c37f20802050126i44c6797exf5d97c8bdca8c1cb@mail.gmail.com> <19c433eb0802050146n2dc4515eo4521b016d2b80495@mail.gmail.com>

FX,

>
> OK

Thanks for the very rapid review - it was committed this morning.

Are you going to manage to find time for PR32841 before 4.3 goes out
of the door?  We are down to two regressions.... supposedly:)  The
other, PR34974, looks like a lost cause for the time being.

Cheers

Paul

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR32315 - DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing [regression vs. g77]
  - From: FX

References:
- [Patch, fortran] PR32315 - DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing [regression vs. g77]
  - From: Paul Richard Thomas
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR32315 - DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing [regression vs. g77]
  - From: FX

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]