This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Fwd: [patch, libfortran] Fix PR 34980]


*sigh* wrong mailing list.
--- Begin Message ---
Hello world,

this fixes PR 34980, a 4.3 regression.

In the PR, there is a comment from Tobias B. with an alternate approach.
I was already into testing my patch when I read that comment, which is
why I didn't pursue that approach further.  I have to admit that I feel
better about adding something that's obviously (to me) correct to a
library function than to do this in the front end.

Regression-tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu.  OK for trunk?

	Thomas

2008-01-27  Thomas Koenig  <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>

	PR libfortran/34980
	* m4/shape.m4:  If return array is empty, return early.
	* generated/shape_i4.c:  Regenerated.
	* generated/shape_i8.c:  Regenerated.
	* generated/shape_i16.c:  Regenerated.

2008-01-27  Thomas Koenig  <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>

	PR libfortran/34980
	* gfortran.dg/shape_3.f90:  New test.

Index: m4/shape.m4
===================================================================
--- m4/shape.m4	(revision 131874)
+++ m4/shape.m4	(working copy)
@@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ shape_'rtype_kind` ('rtype` * const rest
 
   stride = ret->dim[0].stride;
 
+  if (ret->dim[0].ubound < ret->dim[0].lbound)
+    return;
+
   for (n = 0; n < GFC_DESCRIPTOR_RANK (array); n++)
     {
       ret->data[n * stride] =
! { dg-do run }
! PR 34980 - we got a segfault for calling shape
!            with a scalar.
program main
  integer :: n
  n = 5
  open(10,status="scratch")
  write (10,*) shape(n)
  close(10,status="delete")
end

--- End Message ---

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]