This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, i386][PING] libffi stdcall closures

From: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: tromey at redhat dot com
Cc: "Timothy Wall" <twalljava at dev dot java dot net>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:33:58 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH, i386][PING] libffi stdcall closures
References: <8EC5A94D-655C-47D0-B2A8-609DC0434A28@dev.java.net> <m33asotmo1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

On Jan 23, 2008 7:35 PM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>>> "Timothy" == Timothy Wall <twalljava@dev.java.net> writes:
>
> Timothy> Here's the cleaned up patch for stdcall closures in libffi.
> Timothy> Includes test case.
>
> I would appreciate it if an x86 back end maintainer would review the
> back-end-specific parts of this.  The first draft of this patch was
> submitted well before we entered regressions-only mode.

I don't like this rule and think it should not apply in general.

Such is life.  Exceptions are always possible.

Richard.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH, i386][PING] libffi stdcall closures
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- [PATCH, i386][PING] libffi stdcall closures
  - From: Timothy Wall
- Re: [PATCH, i386][PING] libffi stdcall closures
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]