Re: [patch] 2 patches for PR tree-optimization/34648

[Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>]

> Ada does in fact fail to compile with that change, so it does depends on
> ECF_CONST being able to throw.  This does seem wrong to me, but its
> probably too late to address it in stage3.  We should straighten this
> out in stage 1 of 4.4 though.

Let's first discuss it, please.  This presumably has always worked like that, 
let's not change the semantics as a side-effect of fixing a bug. :-)

> Ada fails with a message something like "error: statement marked for
> throw, but doesn't"

Thanks for checking.

-- 
Eric Botcazou