This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [lto] implement awful types_compatible_p hack
On Dec 22, 2007, at 11:39 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 11:23:17AM -0800, Chris Lattner wrote:
On Dec 22, 2007, at 11:08 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
253.perlbmk now compiles (with -fwrapv) and runs properly. This
a miscompile of 176.gcc as the only remaining C SPECint benchmark
LTO doesn't work with.
Cool, what sort of speedups are you seeing?
I haven't done any measurement yet. I think the binaries are a little
smaller (my evidence is slim--I was debugging and noticed that the LTO
dump files inlined in some places where the standoalone compiler
couldn't), but nothing definite. I will attempt to get some numbers
Great. I'd be interested to see what runtime and compile time impact
LTO is starting to show (even though it's very early on). Getting
early numbers can be a good way to track progress as the project moves