This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Update MPFR versions (was Re: Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version)

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com>
Cc: ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:59:49 -0500
Subject: Re: PATCH: Update MPFR versions (was Re: Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version)
References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0712101516230.19901@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <200712180302.lBI32sV2031059@ignucius.se.axis.com>

On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 04:02:54AM +0100, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > -/* Expect failures at least until mpfr-2.3.0 is released. */
> > -/* { dg-xfail-if "This test requires mpfr-2.3.0" { *-*-* } { "*" } { "" } } */

> The FAIL of this test is now exposed on cris-elf.  Is there a
> target feature qualifier missing?

May be the obvious question but... you didn't say what version of
MPFR your GCC was linked with?

(I'm guessing it's either that, or TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS)

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: Update MPFR versions (was Re: Revisiting GCC's minimumMPFR version)
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi

References:
- PATCH: Update MPFR versions (was Re: Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version)
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI
- Re: PATCH: Update MPFR versions (was Re: Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version)
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]