This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Committed: CRIS v32 support 1/2


> Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 13:34:02 +0100
> From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>

> > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr19340.c	(revision 130951)
> > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr19340.c	(working copy)
> > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> >  /* { dg-do compile } */
> >  /* { dg-options "-O1 -fschedule-insns2 -fsched2-use-traces" } */
> > -/* { dg-skip-if "No scheduling" { mmix-*-* cris-*-* fido-*-* m68k-*-* m32c-*-* } { "*" } { "" } } */
> > +/* { dg-skip-if "No scheduling" { mmix-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* fido-*-* m68k-*-* m32c-*-* } { "*" } { "" } } */
> 
> Hm, Is there a reason why cris*-*-* isn't appropriate here?

I think it'd be inappropriate to hog the whole cris* prefix; I
haven't done so elsewhere.  ISTR there's was some academical
processor called CRISP, for one.  The exceptions in
dg.target/cris are already guarded by cris-* and crisv32-*, but
maybe those should have been "*-*-elf" instead, to avoid
confusion.

If it's the long line that bothers, it could be split it into
two dg-skip-if.

brgds, H-P


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]