This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix PR middle-end/33088
> I think the idea and implementation are sound. But, did you verify
> that the places
> we set DECL_GIMPLE_REG_P in the gimplifier are properly guarded with the
> changed predicate? That is, shouldn't the occurances of
> if ((TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (parm)) == COMPLEX_TYPE
> || TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (parm)) == VECTOR_TYPE)
> DECL_GIMPLE_REG_P (parm) = 1;
> changed to use the is_gimple_reg_type predicate? (at least in the
It seems to me that I already answered to this question in the message. :-)
The rationale is that the flag is only really read through is_gimple_reg.