This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Scripted pass manager

From: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: "Rob Quill" <rob dot quill at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Ian Lance Taylor" <iant at google dot com>, "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo at google dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, "Ben Elliston" <bje at air dot net dot au>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 19:41:27 +0100
Subject: Re: Scripted pass manager
References: <baf6008d0711261420n42fb3c98jfcdcce987f651429@mail.gmail.com> <4755E502.6080008@google.com> <m3d4tli27s.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <baf6008d0712051038g61d2d041ob83bf271b1205518@mail.gmail.com>

On Dec 5, 2007 7:38 PM, Rob Quill <rob.quill@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 05 Dec 2007 07:35:35 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:
> > Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com> writes:
> >
> > > A scripted pass manager is a step forward, but I think we can go to a
> > > fully dynamic manager.
>
> OK, so do you think it is best to try and start making a scripted pass
> manager, or jump straight into making a dynamic one?

The difference from what we have now should be similar, so I'd jump
straight to the dynamic one.  Whatever the exact difference between
a scripted (as in my sense - Diego replied to your original mail) and a
dynamic one is ;)

Richard.

References:
- Re: Scripted pass manager
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Scripted pass manager
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Scripted pass manager
  - From: Rob Quill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]