This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Describing commercial support on our website
- From: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Ben Elliston <bje at au1 dot ibm dot com>, David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>, Ankur Gupta <ankur17 at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Ankur Gupta <ankurgupta at acmet dot com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 00:03:29 -0800
- Subject: Re: Describing commercial support on our website
- References: <email@example.com> <20071129221317.GB20723@synopsys.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20071130175209.GA10692@synopsys.com> <email@example.com> <20071130180914.GC10692@synopsys.com> <4750D5C8.firstname.lastname@example.org> <1196636844.16908.10.camel@localhost> <47533D42.email@example.com>
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 03:18:26PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Ben Elliston wrote:
> >> I suggest killing the file as well.
> > In that case, I propose the following patch.
> > Okay for mainline? Apply to any other branches?
> OK if no objections in 72 hours.
> I'd like to give everyone a chance to comment, and, perhaps, to suggest
> that this is something the SC needs to review. I don't think that this
> decision needs that level of oversight, but this is not "just" a
> day-to-day technical issue, so some might reasonably feel we should ask
> the SC, and if there are those that feel that way, then I think we
> should err on the side of caution.
You could post a message on the SC list if you like asking if anyone
objects, but I doubt if anyone will.