This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Put scope blocks on a diet


Jan Hubicka wrote:

> It looks like I've got lost somewhere in this thread. 

Me too.

> My understanding
> is that:
>   - My July 24/26 changes introducted DECL_UID divergence because of
>     correlation of SCOPE block prunning and inlininer duplicating them
>   - Alexandre's and mine patch comitted at Nov 26 reverted this
>     behaviour so DECL_UIDs are now stable because we prune after
>     inlining only
>   - This patch causes memory consumption increase relative to Jul
>     26-Nov26 compiler at -g, but not at -g0 that started this thread

So, in other words, you think we're back at the point we were before the
July changes, in terms of both -g vs. -g0 and in terms of memory
consumption?

If so, then I agree that I don't see any need for further action.

Thanks,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]