This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tuples] C++: gimplify TRY_BLOCK and HANDLER, and EH_SPEC_BLOCK

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
Cc: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 13:59:28 -0400
Subject: Re: [tuples] C++: gimplify TRY_BLOCK and HANDLER, and EH_SPEC_BLOCK
References: <20071018165311.GA5247@redhat.com> <b798aad50710180957y59fa8acbrbe44780f7b9feca2@mail.gmail.com>

Diego Novillo wrote:

My inclination is to have the C++ FE emit GENERIC instead of
microoptimizing into GIMPLE directly.  It gives us a lot more
flexibility and separation.

However, if we take a severe performance hit because of that, then we
should probably go to GIMPLE directly.  I kind of doubt that will be
the case, but we should experiment when testing the branch.

Agreed.

Jason

References:
- [tuples] C++: gimplify TRY_BLOCK and HANDLER, and EH_SPEC_BLOCK
  - From: Aldy Hernandez
- Re: [tuples] C++: gimplify TRY_BLOCK and HANDLER, and EH_SPEC_BLOCK
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]