This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: SRA bit-field optimization
- From: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo at google dot com>
- To: "Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- Cc: "Alexandre Oliva" <aoliva at redhat dot com>, "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, "Roman Zippel" <zippel at linux-m68k dot org>, "Bernd Schmidt" <bernds_cb1 at t-online dot de>, "GCC Patches" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>, "Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:44:35 -0400
- Subject: Re: SRA bit-field optimization
- References: <orfy4czoyq.fsf@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707030240580.1820@scrub.home> <orsl82szfw.fsf@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <or8x817e6t.fsf_-_@free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <orzlz7iis1.fsf@free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <84fc9c000710021015p4276c5d2s70c75e13a2225f30@mail.gmail.com> <4aca3dc20710030736j705204d2u1e54b55e9b2b0682@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/3/07, Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> wrote:
> Was it actually approved anywhere?
> If not, why was it committed?
>
[ Sending from my work account. gcc.gnu.org is rejecting mail from my
personal account. ]
Yes, I approved it earlier this week. Alex, if it's causing
widespread breakage again, please back it out. Perhaps this needs
more work, or the patch needs to be redesigned. It is quite
intrusive, after all.