This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [incremental] Patch: FYI: delay gimplification + partial cgraph revert

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo at google dot com>
Cc: "Gcc Patch List" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 11:15:39 -0600
Subject: Re: [incremental] Patch: FYI: delay gimplification + partial cgraph revert
References: <m3y7eqpekg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <b798aad50709291022g4c59ffc8r767956b649ce48c3@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Diego" == Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com> writes:

Diego> On 9/28/07, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Though the current patch is flawed, I think this is a good direction
>> for the compiler to go.

Diego> I agree.  Would you consider moving this into mainline when stage1
Diego> opens again?  Delaying gimplification on the C/C++ FEs is a Good
Diego> Thing.

Sure thing.  Though perhaps Michael will beat me to it :-)

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [incremental] Patch: FYI: delay gimplification + partial cgraph revert
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- [incremental] Patch: FYI: delay gimplification + partial cgraph revert
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [incremental] Patch: FYI: delay gimplification + partial cgraph revert
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]