This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Remove expand_body langhook

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Cc: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:28:12 -0600
Subject: Re: Remove expand_body langhook
References: <20070909125433.GG30523@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <46E4421B.80902@codesourcery.com> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0709111640500.3761@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <20070912071012.GE21969@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> writes:

Jan> I forgot to test treelang, sorry.  I am testing attached patch I
Jan> will commit as obvious

How about we delete treelang?  It adds busy-work to otherwise
straightforward patches, and AFAIK is not used anywhere.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Remove expand_body langhook
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Remove expand_body langhook
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: Remove expand_body langhook
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: Remove expand_body langhook
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI

References:
- Remove expand_body langhook
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Remove expand_body langhook
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Remove expand_body langhook
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI
- Re: Remove expand_body langhook
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]