This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH INSTALLED]: const typedefs part 19/N
On 8/28/07, Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> wrote:
> On 8/28/07, Dave Korn <dave.korn@artimi.com> wrote:
> > On 28 August 2007 18:24, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> >
> > > On 8/28/07, Dave Korn <dave.korn@artimi.com> wrote:
> > >> On 28 August 2007 18:05, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On 8/28/07, Dave Korn <dave.korn@artimi.com> wrote:
> > For pulling figures out of thin air? Apology accepted! <insert HHOS tag
> > here!>
>
> Sorry, not going to apologize for extrapolating based on the data.
> You can believe it or not.
>
> I don't see you citing sources for *any* of your claims that it will
> make things more difficult for our users.
>
> For all you know, it could be easier for our users. They could all
> have C++ compilers, but have to have downloaded C compilers to build
> GCC.
>
> After all, any claims to the contrary would have to be "pulled out of
> thin air" since you don't have numbers!
>
BTW, The next time you want to argue about data, please don't pull
figures out of thin air by claiming to know what our users's hardship
level is and whether it will be increased or not, without real data.
After all, you are the one who claimed it would be harder for users.
Please provide your evidence and data that this is true. Not
arguments. Real, hard, absolute data.
After all, you wouldn't have said it if you didn't have numbers, since
you "never pull data out of thin air".
I await your reply and data!