This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH INSTALLED]: const typedefs part 19/N

From: "Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
To: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: "Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:35:39 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH INSTALLED]: const typedefs part 19/N
References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0708262352520.25986@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <4aca3dc20708270733p7181ee8dreb4ca0e804fb8eaf@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0708271157500.27659@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <84fc9c000708270909w4fa3fcf3q6b7cb9decee5bffb@mail.gmail.com>

That said, I vote for forcing stage1 to be build with a C++ compiler for
next stage1.

I don't think it's reasonable to require a C++ compiler to build the GNU C compiler, especially on non-GNU platforms. You may only have a C compiler in the default installation and it should be sufficient to bootstrap GCC.

-- Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH INSTALLED]: const typedefs part 19/N
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH INSTALLED]: const typedefs part 19/N
  - From: Daniel Berlin

References:
- [PATCH INSTALLED]: const typedefs part 19/N
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI
- Re: [PATCH INSTALLED]: const typedefs part 19/N
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: [PATCH INSTALLED]: const typedefs part 19/N
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI
- Re: [PATCH INSTALLED]: const typedefs part 19/N
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]