This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Broken tree with PATCH: back end initialization reorganization
- From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>
- To: "Sandra Loosemore" <sandra at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: "Hans-Peter Nilsson" <hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, davidu at mips dot com, nigel at mips dot com
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:23:36 -0700
- Subject: Re: Broken tree with PATCH: back end initialization reorganization
- References: <200708271903.l7RJ38NF006232@ignucius.se.axis.com> <46D3251A.7070201@codesourcery.com>
On 8/27/07, Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> I was specifically thinking about this problem:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-07/msg00359.html
>
> that was finally fixed two weeks later:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg01878.html
Let me point out that between those two weeks, the GCC summit happened
so that is an exception to the rule rather than a problem with our
rules.
Also two weeks is a long time but remember the timmings of such
changes, we are now heading to the last couple of weeks of stage2
which means we really need to start thinking about doing more stage3
type of work. Also the change there, broke two targets, MIPS and
alpha. While your change broke any target which have auto
increment/decrements (PowerPC, ARM, and many others).
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski