This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH INSTALLED]: const typedefs part 19/N

From: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo at google dot com>
To: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
Cc: "Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:07:15 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH INSTALLED]: const typedefs part 19/N
References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0708262352520.25986@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <4aca3dc20708270733p7181ee8dreb4ca0e804fb8eaf@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0708271157500.27659@caipclassic.rutgers.edu>

On 8/27/07, Kaveh R. GHAZI <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> wrote:

> Just curious, how serious are you about using C++ and how much support do
> you think there is for that?

I would be personally delighted if we switched to C++ (with
restrictions), but after that informal poll at the GCC summit, I don't
think it will be easy to do.  More than a few folks didn't care too
much for that.

> Ok, I'll revert the const_last_stmt and related bits.  Thanks for the
> feedback.

Thanks!

References:
- [PATCH INSTALLED]: const typedefs part 19/N
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI
- Re: [PATCH INSTALLED]: const typedefs part 19/N
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: [PATCH INSTALLED]: const typedefs part 19/N
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]