This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, fortran] Add -frecursive and fix local array handling with -fopenmp

From: "Asher Langton" <langton2 at llnl dot gov>
To: "Tobias Burnus" <burnus at net-b dot de>
Cc: "Janne Blomqvist" <blomqvist dot janne at gmail dot com>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:24:18 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH, fortran] Add -frecursive and fix local array handling with -fopenmp
References: <1953a4560708151258p44c9b855n2a0fc521879b3a25@mail.gmail.com> <7b446c2e0708151452o7bc6eebcyd995f42fbe8a8e6a@mail.gmail.com> <46C40FEC.6060101@net-b.de>

On 8/16/07, Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de> wrote:
> gfortran (currently):
> -fno-automatic: As Intel's -save: use static memory
> -fmax-stack-var-size=<n> stack vs. static memory; incl. n=-1 to put all
> on the stack

As of now, fmax-stack-var-size=<n> doesn't accept n=-1 on the command
line, although setting n=-1 works internally.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH, fortran] Add -frecursive and fix local array handling with -fopenmp
  - From: Tobias Burnus

References:
- [PATCH, fortran] Add -frecursive and fix local array handling with -fopenmp
  - From: Asher Langton
- Re: [PATCH, fortran] Add -frecursive and fix local array handling with -fopenmp
  - From: Janne Blomqvist
- Re: [PATCH, fortran] Add -frecursive and fix local array handling with -fopenmp
  - From: Tobias Burnus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]