This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hello David, Thanks for your review! > 1) Where is TARGET_PAIRED_FLOAT defined if 750cl.h is not included? I fixed that. It's now defined in rs6000.h. > > 2) Why is this enabled for powerpc64-linux? Why not a special paired > configuration and why not powerpc-linux? fixed. I was not sure if a special paired configuration is needed. I can add it if you think it's needed. > 3) The patch damages the formatting in an Altivec function: fixed. > > 4) The patch adds PROCESSOR_PPC750CL and related CPU attr, but no > scheduling information. It only uses PROCESSOR_PPC750CL identically to > PROCESSOR_PPC750, so why define it? It doesn't even enable TARGET_PAIRED. I removed those. > 5) The patch adds paired builtins to the bdesc_Narg structures, but those > only are enabled if -maltivec or -mspe is used. There is no mask, but the > code in rs6000_expand_builtin asserts that they are enabled. How does > this work? I recall this problem related to the fact we reached the limit of mask bits on ppc. Therefore I added the following check in def_builtin to enable 750cl builtins: static void def_builtin (int mask, const char *name, tree type, int code) { if ((mask & target_flags) || (TARGET_PAIRED_FLOAT && target_flags)) { if (rs6000_builtin_decls[code]) abort (); rs6000_builtin_decls[code] = add_builtin_function (name, type, code, BUILT_IN_MD, NULL, NULL_TREE); } } Attached is the patch with your comments. Thanks, Revital (See attached file: patch_750cl_16_8.txt)
Attachment:
patch_750cl_16_8.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |