This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Wrong coverage attribution.
- From: "Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)" <seongbae dot park at gmail dot com>
- To: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Janis Johnson" <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>, mark at codesourcery dot com, nathan at codesourcery dot com
- Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 21:41:00 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Wrong coverage attribution.
- References: <ab3a61990707261609m285359d7hebfd00e8247beda7@mail.gmail.com> <ab3a61990707301127q304f10b8m39b684c8435b79a1@mail.gmail.com>
*ping^2*
FYI, this pending patch is holding my other approved patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg00366.html
Seongbae
On 7/30/07, Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培) <seongbae.park@gmail.com> wrote:
> *ping*
>
> On 7/26/07, Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培) <seongbae.park@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > 2007-07-26 Seongbae Park <seongbae.park@gmail.com>
> >
> > * tree-eh.c (lower_try_finally_onedest): Reset the locus of moved goto.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > 2007-07-26 Seongbae Park <seongbae.park@gmail.com>
> >
> > * lib/gcov.exp (verify-lines): Recognize - and # as possible count.
> > * g++.dg/gcov/gcov-4.C: New test.
> >
> >
> > Attached patch fixes the problem shown in the testcase
> > - this testcase fails in the current mainline
> > because of GOTO moved to a different block during eh lowering.
> >
> > Bootstrap and regtest are in progress.
> > If all tests look clean,
> > ok for mainline and 4.2 branch ?