This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH,fortran]: fix bind(c) common block alignment

From: "François-Xavier Coudert" <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
To: "Christopher D. Rickett" <crickett at lanl dot gov>
Cc: "Tobias Schlüter" <Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 18:27:06 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH,fortran]: fix bind(c) common block alignment
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708061050430.7474@lennox.lanl.gov> <46B755C7.3040601@physik.uni-muenchen.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708061111560.7474@lennox.lanl.gov>

> if it is acceptable for all common blocks to choose a C compatible
> alignment, then the patch is trivial to change to do this.  is that what
> people prefer?

I think we certainly do not want to rush that decision. I bit of
investigation, seeing what g77 did, what other compilers do, etc. is
certainly necessary before changing an established behaviour.

FX

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH,fortran]: fix bind(c) common block alignment
  - From: Christopher D. Rickett

References:
- [PATCH,fortran]: fix bind(c) common block alignment
  - From: Christopher D. Rickett
- Re: [PATCH,fortran]: fix bind(c) common block alignment
  - From: Tobias Schlüter
- Re: [PATCH,fortran]: fix bind(c) common block alignment
  - From: Christopher D. Rickett

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]