This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH INSTALLED]: const typedefs part 1/N

From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 15:43:29 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH INSTALLED]: const typedefs part 1/N
References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0707251400310.25472@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <de8d50360708011714m1e8e6a20w67725a7ff5c9dfec@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0708021104390.19283@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0708021815220.20350@caipclassic.rutgers.edu>

On 8/2/07, Kaveh R. GHAZI <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> GCC 3.0 - 3.3 warns for both assignments to t3.  IMHO, it's a bug for gcc
> for warn like this, and it was properly fixed in 3.4.0.

Why is it wrong for GCC to warn here?
We have typeof(tree const) const which has the duplicated const there.
I feel that there should be a warning in that case still.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH INSTALLED]: const typedefs part 1/N
  - From: Chris Lattner

References:
- Re: [PATCH INSTALLED]: const typedefs part 1/N
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [PATCH INSTALLED]: const typedefs part 1/N
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI
- Re: [PATCH INSTALLED]: const typedefs part 1/N
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]