Re: potiential problems with parm decls.

[Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>]

Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
>
>   
>> My only concern here is that you said at the summit that these were not
>> in gimple.  If they are in gimple, then it should not be a big deal for
>> me to co-opt the existing machinery to put each of them in its own
>> section. 
>>     
>
> I'm not sure "being GIMPLE" has meaning in this context; they're just
> data.  The expressions are all constants, like "3", "&foo", or "&foo +
> 1".  These can be arranged in aggregates; you can have a CONSTRUCTOR
> whose elements are "3" and "&foo", for example.  Will that work?
>
> Thanks,
>
>   
i think that the short answer is that they are not gimple.

I have a way to put out counted strings.  I assume that each of these is
just an list (or array) of counted strings.  If that is all, (i.e. there
is not any deeper structure) then I can look into it. 

Give me some pointers so i can figure out the datastructures i need to
walk and rebuild.

kenny.