This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tuples] walk_tree for tuples

From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
To: Christopher Matthews <chrismatthews at google dot com>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:18:55 -0400
Subject: Re: [tuples] walk_tree for tuples
References: <20070712162118.GA16637@redhat.com> <46966780.8050707@google.com> <20070712185914.GA21839@redhat.com> <5794c4c80707121223p66697029i5512481f84da55b5@mail.gmail.com> <20070712200134.GA23959@redhat.com> <5794c4c80707131206p2617119bo373e10e9bf3a367e@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 12:06:53PM -0700, Christopher Matthews wrote:
> So, if labels returns the default labels too, does it makes sense that
> nlabels should include the default label in the count?   I was just

It makes sense to me.  Diego, what do you think?

References:
- [tuples] walk_tree for tuples
  - From: Aldy Hernandez
- Re: [tuples] walk_tree for tuples
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tuples] walk_tree for tuples
  - From: Aldy Hernandez
- Re: [tuples] walk_tree for tuples
  - From: Christopher Matthews
- Re: [tuples] walk_tree for tuples
  - From: Aldy Hernandez
- Re: [tuples] walk_tree for tuples
  - From: Christopher Matthews

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]