This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [libstdc++-v3 patch] Fix invalid use of signed wchar_t and unsigned wchar_t in <type_traits>

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Doug Gregor <doug dot gregor at gmail dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 19:53:09 +0200
Subject: Re: [libstdc++-v3 patch] Fix invalid use of signed wchar_t and unsigned wchar_t in <type_traits>
References: <24b520d20706291348i249ab08bq22c88f5c5c0e055d@mail.gmail.com> <4685944D.5050902@suse.de> <24b520d20706300647x78f00140h29f1fdc4d0ee8b53@mail.gmail.com>

Doug Gregor wrote:

It's not C++0x-specific. The mainline compiler will complain about
unsigned/signed wchar_t, but only with -pedantic. Otherwise, it
silently ignores the "signed" or "unsigned" part.
Apparently, this header never gets compiled with -pedantic on mainline.

Ah, ok, I was simply missing the -pedantic thing. Then, let's just remove those specializations, I agree.

Paolo.

References:
- [libstdc++-v3 patch] Fix invalid use of signed wchar_t and unsigned wchar_t in <type_traits>
  - From: Doug Gregor
- Re: [libstdc++-v3 patch] Fix invalid use of signed wchar_t and unsigned wchar_t in <type_traits>
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [libstdc++-v3 patch] Fix invalid use of signed wchar_t and unsigned wchar_t in <type_traits>
  - From: Doug Gregor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]