Re: RTL sharing tester (for testing)

[Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>]

> Diego Novillo wrote:
> 
> > How expensive is this verification?  My inclination is to enable the
> > sharing verifier in a couple of steps:
> > 
> > 1- Right now, enable it in every pass that doesn't expose bootstrap
> > problems.  I'm actually willing to live with breakage in the testsuite
> > and address it during stages 2 and 3.
> > 
> > 2- Once the bootstrap problems are fixed, leave the verifier enabled
> > everywhere.
> > 
> > But since this will affect stages 2 and 3, I'd like to get Mark's opinion.
> 
> I'd like to turn it on only where it does not cause breakage in either
> bootstrapping or testing.  Maintaining stability of the testsuite
> results, so that we can tell what's a regression and what isn't, is very
> useful.  Let's at least get it to the point where it's clean on the
> primary platforms before turning it on by defaultA

OK, from the list of primary platforms, I have access to:

    * i686-pc-linux-gnu
    * x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
    * powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu

I know powerpc64 breaks in libjava what I plan to fix tomorrow.
Would be possible to test the patch on the remaining platforms and help
me to debug it, please?
    * arm-eabi
    * i386-unknown-freebsd
    * i686-apple-darwin
    * mipsisa64-elf
    * sparc-sun-solaris2.10

Honza
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- 
> Mark Mitchell
> CodeSourcery
> mark@codesourcery.com
> (650) 331-3385 x713