This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Bug tree-optimization/32461] [4.3 Regression] Segmentation fault in build_classic_dist_vector_1() at tree-data-ref.c:2700


On 6/24/07, Sebastian Pop <sebpop@gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/24/07, Sebastian Pop <sebpop@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/24/07, Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> >  An alternative is to use
> >
> >           if (TREE_CODE (arg1) == BIT_NOT_EXPR
> >               && !TYPE_OVERFLOW_TRAPS (type))
> >              {
> >                 tem = TREE_OPERAND (arg1, 0);
> >                 STRIP_NOPS (tem);
> >                 if (operand_equal_p (arg0, tem, 0))
> >  ...
> >
> > which would be even better and shouldn't cause other missed
> > optimizations.
> >
>
> Okay, attached is the patch that implements this.
> I'm bootstrapping and testing it on i686-linux.
>

Passed bootstrap with --enable-checking=yes,fold,rtl
and no new regressions in the testsuite.  Okay for trunk?

Yes, this is ok.


Thanks,
Richard.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]