This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch, rfc] PR32172 - Update -funsafe-math-optimizations flag definition

From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr (Dominique Dhumieres)
To: richard dot guenther at gmail dot com, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
Cc: rguenther at suse dot de, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, ERES at il dot ibm dot com
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:56:04 +0200
Subject: Re: [patch, rfc] PR32172 - Update -funsafe-math-optimizations flag definition
References: <OFBA2C149E.C2ACA84F-ONC22572ED.0025C4E6-C22572EF.0047873F@il.ibm.com> <20070603131040.F04ED5BB6C@mailhost.lps.ens.fr> <84fc9c000706031330i4035519w8a926321127688d9@mail.gmail.com>

> There is no difference between both cases for gcc.

I don't understand why and I am still convinced that it has been
a very bad idea.

This should be separated to other useful optimizations.

Dominique

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch, rfc] PR32172 - Update -funsafe-math-optimizations flag definition
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- [patch, rfc] PR32172 - Update -funsafe-math-optimizations flag definition
  - From: Revital1 Eres
- Re: [patch, rfc] PR32172 - Update -funsafe-math-optimizations flag definition
  - From: Dominique Dhumieres
- Re: [patch, rfc] PR32172 - Update -funsafe-math-optimizations flag definition
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]