This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH]: PR middle-end/31796 use MPFR to evaluate remquo/remainder/drem at compile-time

From: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 23:07:40 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: PR middle-end/31796 use MPFR to evaluate remquo/remainder/drem at compile-time
References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0705051328590.14660@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <84fc9c000705170259w2a47211p19e1d08c60041d89@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0705172216310.24005@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <de8d50360705171941w2a20f4f1jb8f9a16519a92fdb@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 17 May 2007, Andrew Pinski wrote:

> It seems better to add a new testcase rather than change the current one
> for every added builtin.  The reasoning behind this is so you compare
> 4.2's testresults with 4.3's. (or any inbetween).
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski

I agree in general.  However this particular testcase is new to gcc-4.3.
So you'd never have it appear in your 4.2 test results for comparison.

		Regards,
		--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi			ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu

References:
- [PATCH]: PR middle-end/31796 use MPFR to evaluate remquo/remainder/drem at compile-time
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI
- Re: [PATCH]: PR middle-end/31796 use MPFR to evaluate remquo/remainder/drem at compile-time
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH]: PR middle-end/31796 use MPFR to evaluate remquo/remainder/drem at compile-time
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI
- Re: [PATCH]: PR middle-end/31796 use MPFR to evaluate remquo/remainder/drem at compile-time
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]