This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: mips tls with -mlong64/-mgp32

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: richard at codesourcery dot com
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 16:38:26 -0400
Subject: Re: mips tls with -mlong64/-mgp32
References: <200705102046.l4AKkiB4017813@greed.delorie.com> <20070510212451.GA2251@caradoc.them.org> <200705102127.l4ALRckj018854@greed.delorie.com> <871whna72x.fsf@firetop.home> <200705111222.l4BCMmn1029370@greed.delorie.com> <87wszf8qr3.fsf@firetop.home> <200705111305.l4BD556S030628@greed.delorie.com> <87k5vf8pm6.fsf@firetop.home> <20070511133321.GA1076@caradoc.them.org> <878xbv8oid.fsf@firetop.home>

> We should already treat DImode %tprel addresses as non-offsettable,
> so with any luck, the fix should simply be to change "m" to "o" in
> the d<->m !TARGET_64BIT movdi patterns.

FYI a simple m->o change doesn't fix the bug.

References:
- mips tls with -mlong64/-mgp32
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: mips tls with -mlong64/-mgp32
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: mips tls with -mlong64/-mgp32
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: mips tls with -mlong64/-mgp32
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: mips tls with -mlong64/-mgp32
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: mips tls with -mlong64/-mgp32
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: mips tls with -mlong64/-mgp32
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: mips tls with -mlong64/-mgp32
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: mips tls with -mlong64/-mgp32
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: mips tls with -mlong64/-mgp32
  - From: Richard Sandiford

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]