Re: [PATCH] Fix PR 29609, being able to set a breakpoint on goto/continue/break

["Steven Bosscher" <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>]

On 5/4/07, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> wrote:
> On Apr 30, 2007, at 2:15 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > Hm no. Actually you're right.  For the explicit goto we do need the
> > separate basic block, because, as you said, we always end up stepping
> > onto the break if it's treated as an implicit goto. Hmm...  But that
> > still feels wrong somehow.  I need to think this over some more...
> > Maybe we can still fix this in cfgexpand instead of adding extra basic
> > blocks.
>
> Hi Steven,
>
> are you still working on this problem ?


I've tried a few things, but nothings works the way I want it to.
Your patch will of course work.  I still don't like it very much that
we need extra basic blocks.  We also have to be careful to produce the
same code with and without -g.  But there doesn't seem to be another
practical way fix this bug.  I've clearly underestimated this problem.

Gr.
Steven