This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libjava Divide_1 and pr6388 fail on 4.2.0 RC3 for several targets
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>, Kaz Kojima <kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 07 May 2007 17:31:06 -0700
- Subject: Re: libjava Divide_1 and pr6388 fail on 4.2.0 RC3 for several targets
- References: <20070506.110229.74748979.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp> <463D47A8.1070704@avtrex.com> <m3k5vk34dr.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <463F6C82.7020603@codesourcery.com>
Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
> Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> > This patch appears to fix the problem. I'm running the libjava tests
> > now. Does this look OK to the java maintainers for 4.2 branch and
> > mainline? Mark, should I commit to 4.2 branch?
>
> If this (or a variant) is approved by the Java maintainers, please do
> apply the same patch to the 4.2 branch, unless I've warned that I'm
> doing a final release build. (That's not going to happen imminently;
> I'm still reviewing the latest lists of nasties.)
Patch committed to mainline and 4.2 branch on the grounds that 1) it
is obvious; 2) in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31842#c3
Andrew Haley saw the patch and didn't choke.
Ian