This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Reload bug & SRA oddness

Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> It might make sense to test whether, instead of a DImode variable, a
> pair of SImode variables would do (i.e., no bit-fields crossing the
> SImode boundary), as long as registers are known to hold SImode but
> not DImode.  But is there a generic way to test for such "efficiency
> boundaries"?

I'd start with

  GET_MODE_SIZE (foo) <= UNITS_PER_WORD

as a first order approximation.


Bernd
-- 
This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers.
Analog Devices GmbH      Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6      80807 Muenchen
Sitz der Gesellschaft Muenchen, Registergericht Muenchen HRB 40368
Geschaeftsfuehrer Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin, Margaret Seif
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]