This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR31011 - Incorrect error: parameter array sections

From: Brooks Moses <brooks dot moses at codesourcery dot com>
To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:57:50 -0800
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR31011 - Incorrect error: parameter array sections
References: <339c37f20703072222o3a3e57dfgbbe60d4e5aff96d@mail.gmail.com> <20070308064607.GA84810@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

Steve Kargl wrote:

On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:22:11AM +0100, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
2007-03-08 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
	PR fortran/31011
	* expr.c (find_array_section): Correct arithmetic for section
	size.
2007-03-08 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
	PR fortran/31011
	* gfortran.dg/parameter_array_section_2.f90: New test.
OK for both. Note, Mark is working towards a 4.2.0 releases. I haven't seen an email about a freeze, yet.

Last Sunday, Mark stated that he was planning to do a RC1 of 4.2.0 "in a week". On the other hand, he also mentioned that it would be good to reduce the number of P1 and P2 regressions from the 139 that were listed at the time, and the number is still at 135 (though that's with a couple of new ones filed), so I don't know if that will delay things or not.

In any case, I'm cleaning up minor documentation stuff in the expectation of a freeze this weekend.

- Brooks

References:
- [Patch, fortran] PR31011 - Incorrect error: parameter array sections
  - From: Paul Richard Thomas
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR31011 - Incorrect error: parameter array sections
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]