Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-03-04)

["Manuel López-Ibáñez" <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>]

On 06/03/07, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> > On 05/03/07, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> >> After reviewing all of the traffic[1] that stemmed from my previous
> >> status report, I've decided that, indeed, it makes sense to steam ahead
> >> with GCC 4.2.0 based on current GCC 4.2.0 release branch.
> >>
> >
> > I ask special permission to apply this patch:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg01461.html
> >
> > to GCC 4.2.0. This patch is trivial and it has been in GCC 4.3 for a
> > few weeks already.
>
> This patch is OK for 4.2.0, on the grounds that the -Walways-true option
> has not yet appeared in any FSF release, and we don't want to release
> the option with semantics different than what are eventually intended.
>
> Thanks,

As far as I know, it was introduced in GCC 4.2 revision 108489.

Also:

$ svn log svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-4_2-branch | grep -n
-e "Walways.true"
63424:  * gcc.dg/20031012-1.c: Add -Walways-true option.
63978:  * doc/invoke.texi (Warning Options): Document -Walways-true being
64532:  * common.opt (Walways-true): New option.

while

$ svn log svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-4_1-branch | grep -n
-e "Walways.true"

shows nothing.

Cheers,

Manuel.