This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Reduce Dwarf Debug Size

From: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
To: tromey at redhat dot com
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 14:16:13 -0800
Subject: Re: Reduce Dwarf Debug Size
References: <352a1fb20703011054s31e07ea1ye93eaa49fcc513e1@mail.gmail.com> <m3649k23bz.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <352a1fb20703011124v2ed161eelcc431ec362e8329@mail.gmail.com> <m3wt20zlt3.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <643DEA4E-C8FD-4D7B-8C3F-87DDFA51961D@apple.com> <m3649jtrcf.fsf@localhost.localdomain>

On Mar 2, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Tom Tromey wrote:

Some of this, though, is just the problem of having too few maintainers for some areas. E.g., there is no active libcpp maintainer.

This, I fear, would lead to directionless maintenance.

Well, as I recall, libcpp for the most part has only needed light directionless maintenance for a while now. I don't think that is a bad thing. I don't fear it.

References:
- Re: Reduce Dwarf Debug Size
  - From: Devang Patel
- Re: Reduce Dwarf Debug Size
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Reduce Dwarf Debug Size
  - From: Devang Patel
- Re: Reduce Dwarf Debug Size
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Reduce Dwarf Debug Size
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: Reduce Dwarf Debug Size
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]