This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RTL, ColdFire 24/63] Add support for a MODE_INDEX_REG_CLASS macro
- From: Jeffrey Law <law at redhat dot com>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1 at t-online dot de>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, Richard Sandiford <richard at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:35:00 -0700
- Subject: Re: [RTL, ColdFire 24/63] Add support for a MODE_INDEX_REG_CLASS macro
- References: <874pqzw4w1.fsf@firetop.home> <87odp7tag7.fsf_-_@firetop.home> <87k5zvtad6.fsf_-_@firetop.home> <87fyajtaas.fsf_-_@firetop.home> <87bql7ta58.fsf_-_@firetop.home> <877ivvt9ws.fsf_-_@firetop.home> <873b6jt9r5.fsf_-_@firetop.home> <87y7obrv3h.fsf_-_@firetop.home> <87tzyzrv1p.fsf_-_@firetop.home> <87ps9nruzl.fsf_-_@firetop.home> <87lkkbrux2.fsf_-_@firetop.home> <87hcuzruvd.fsf_-_@firetop.home> <87d55nruu3.fsf_-_@firetop.home> <878xgbruqs.fsf_-_@firetop.home> <1168457319.28081.615.camel@sweet.slc.redhat.com> <87k5zuinc0.fsf@firetop.home> <1168983686.28081.842.camel@sweet.slc.redhat.com> <87ps9efc4t.fsf@talisman.home> <1171321913.4134.162.camel@sweet.slc.redhat.com> <87bqjx9j0r.fsf@firetop.home> <1171472988.4134.196.camel@sweet.slc.redhat.com> <87vei47ij9.fsf@firetop.home> <m3d54cy6k6.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <45D44F7F.6000405@t-online.de> <45DE5A9F.5000509@codesourcery.com>
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 19:08 -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> I'm not quite sure if I know exactly whose court the ball is in at this
> point. If I understand correctly, Jeff is still unhappy with the patch,
> and Richard still thinks it's the right thing.
It's in my court. Current todo is to look at what Bernd did and why
and ponder how it plays with what Richard wants to do.
I'd also like to see (and this is a new request) some code which
triggers these problems. I have a couple theories that I'd like to
poke at, but without triggering code that's going to be tough to do.
Just to be 100% clear, I want to get this resolved too, but I have
concerns that the patch is a terribly bad idea.
Jeff