This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Improve debug info for Ada (4/4)

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 20:24:20 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve debug info for Ada (4/4)
References: <200702122029.34142.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <200702140804.39415.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <20070214135911.GA1749@caradoc.them.org>

> There ought to be relatively few locations.  You could probably
> compromise and not show every moment it was loaded into a register
> from its assigned stack slot, and still do OK.  I think this is just a
> consequence of our already overly pessimistic -O0 - compare to what
> some other compilers do with "no" optimization...

I'm starting to get convinced. :-)  It turns out that -fvar-tracking is 
probably necessary to get fully correct debug info for parameters that
are referenced in nested functions.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Improve debug info for Ada (4/4)
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- [PATCH] Improve debug info for Ada (4/4)
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH] Improve debug info for Ada (4/4)
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH] Improve debug info for Ada (4/4)
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]