This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH RFC: -Wstrict-overflow, take 2

From: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: "Ian Lance Taylor" <iant at google dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, "Jan Hubicka" <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:50:32 +0100
Subject: Re: PATCH RFC: -Wstrict-overflow, take 2
References: <m3hctwgi1d.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <m364a53cuz.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <84fc9c000702140433w5d47211ex5efccb4cf3187773@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000702140844x741cc64ds7d7c65d66161f363@mail.gmail.com> <m31wksznyg.fsf@localhost.localdomain>

On 14 Feb 2007 08:46:47 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:

"Richard Guenther" <richard.guenther@gmail.com> writes:
> Fixed by the following, bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> using gcc 3.3 as bootstrap compiler.
>
> Richard.
>
> 2007-02-14  Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>
>
>         * flags.h (issue_strict_overflow_warning): Convert to a macro.
Thanks, I was just testing that patch myself.

I don't know why I didn't see this problem.

I guess -fkeep-inline-functions is no longer working properly. Honza?

Richard.

References:
- PATCH RFC: -Wstrict-overflow, take 2
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: PATCH RFC: -Wstrict-overflow, take 2
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: PATCH RFC: -Wstrict-overflow, take 2
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: PATCH RFC: -Wstrict-overflow, take 2
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: PATCH RFC: -Wstrict-overflow, take 2
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]