This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[RFA:] No timeout for ext/pb_ds/regression/hash_data_map_rand.cc
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com>
- To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 04:41:38 +0100
- Subject: [RFA:] No timeout for ext/pb_ds/regression/hash_data_map_rand.cc
For background, see
<URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg00450.html>.
This test is one of those that are close to the 5 min timeout
for "a modern system", causing this to be flagged as a
regression whenever there's any load on the system. As with
testsuite/23_containers/set/modifiers/16728.cc there didn't seem
to be anything magical about the numbers. Reducing the number
of iterations seemed better than reducing both, and "as usual"
by a factor of 1000.
Ok to commit?
libstdc++-v3:
* testsuite/ext/pb_ds/regression/hash_data_map_rand.cc: Use only 5
iterations for simulator targets.
Index: testsuite/ext/pb_ds/regression/hash_data_map_rand.cc
===================================================================
--- testsuite/ext/pb_ds/regression/hash_data_map_rand.cc (revision 121581)
+++ testsuite/ext/pb_ds/regression/hash_data_map_rand.cc (working copy)
@@ -48,13 +48,22 @@
#include <regression/rand/assoc/rand_regression_test.hpp>
#include <regression/assoc/common_type.hpp>
+// This can take long on simulators, timing out the test.
+// { dg-options "-DPB_DS_REGRESSION -DITERATIONS=5" { target simulator } }
+#ifndef ITERATIONS
+#define ITERATIONS 5000
+#endif
+#ifndef KEYS
+#define KEYS 10000
+#endif
+
int
main(int argc, char* a_p_argv[])
{
using namespace pb_ds::test;
typedef hash_map_tl_t map_tl_t;
- return rand_regression_test(5000, 10000,
+ return rand_regression_test(ITERATIONS, KEYS,
"hash_data_map_rand_regression_test",
map_tl_t());
}
brgds, H-P